Cerebrovascular disorders and Fabry disease
0
, ... Abstract
Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the GLA gene encoding for alpha-galactosidase A. Renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular involvement are the leading complications in early adulthood and are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Cerebrovascular manifestations in FD manifest as ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack and less frequently as hemorrhagic strokes. Many patients may develop their stroke not only before other major complications but also before the diagnosis of FD is made. This review will describe the frequency and characteristics of cerebrovascular disease in FD, the complex pathophysiological mechanisms, the neuroimaging findings, the value of screening studies in young patients with stroke, and the controversies regarding the beneficial effect of ERT for the prevention of cerebrovascular disease in FD.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the GLA gene encoding for alpha-galactosidase A (α-GAL A). FD is characterized by progressive and multisystemic lysosomal accumulation of glycosphingolipids involving peripheral nerves, gastrointestinal tract, skin, heart, kidneys, and brain. As a consequence, a myriad of progressive signs and symptoms may be present, including neuropathic pain, hypohidrosis, exercise intolerance, gastrointestinal symptoms, hearing loss, tinnitus, angiokeratoma, “cornea verticillata”, left ventricular hypertrophy, proteinuria, decreased renal function, and stroke[1-4]. Estimates of the prevalence of FD range from approximately 1 in 117,000 to 1 in 37,000 live male births for classic FD and up to 1 in 1,400 in some newborn screening projects when atypical FD variants are included[5-7].
Symptoms usually begin in childhood and adolescence, particularly in the classical Type 1 phenotype, and are mainly characterized by gastrointestinal symptoms, anhidrosis, and neuropathic pain, and progressively lead to kidney and heart involvement, as well as stroke. Misdiagnosis is common[8], with a long delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis[9]. Renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular involvement are the leading complications in early adulthood and are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. By contrast, patients with the Type 2 later-onset phenotype have residual enzyme activity and, therefore, present with delayed clinical manifestations. Cardiac or renal involvement may be observed in these patients after their fourth decade of life and stroke may also occur as an isolated manifestation[10-12].
Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been available for the treatment of FD since 2001 and is the standard of care[13]. Two ERT formulations are available currently: agalsidase alfa[14] and agalsidase beta[15]. Additionally, an α-GAL A pharmacological chaperone, migalastat, can be used to treat certain patients with an amenable GLA mutation[16].
This review will describe the frequency and characteristics of cerebrovascular disease in FD, the complex pathophysiological mechanisms, the neuroimaging findings, the value of screening studies in young patients with stroke, and the controversies regarding the beneficial effect of ERT for the prevention of cerebrovascular disease in FD.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF VASCULAR DAMAGE IN FD
Vasculopathy in FD is the result of overlapping abnormalities in the vessel wall, the blood components, and the circulation[17,18].
Vasculopathy and Gb3
Two primary hypotheses have been proposed for the pathogenesis of vasculopathy in FD. The first underlines the pathologic effects of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) on the endothelial cells, while the second stresses the deleterious effect of globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) on the muscular layer of blood vessels [Figure 1]. Following alpha-GAL A deficiency, Gb3 accumulates within caveolae of endothelial cells, resulting in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) uncoupling and superoxide (O2-) production. Nitric oxide is consumed to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-), which leads to the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine (3NT). Gb3 accumulation is sufficient to account for the dysregulation of eNOS[19], as demonstrated in alpha-GAL A knockout mice[20]. Studies on cerebral blood flow have reported either decreased or enhanced flow. These seemingly contradictory findings might be due to eNOS uncoupling with secondary oxidative stress[21,22].
Figure 1. A visual summary of the mechanism detailed in the section of pathophysiology. Image adapted by authors from ref[17,38]. tPA: Tissue plasmínogen activator; VCAM: vascular cell adhesion molecule; ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule; Lyso-Gb3: globotriaosylsphingosine; ROS: reactive oxygen species; NO: nitric oxide; ANG: angiotensin; AT-1: angiotensin type 1 receptor; AT-2: angiotensin type 2 receptor; MPO: myeloperoxidase; RBC: red blood cells; WBC: white blood cells.
A pro-oxidant state occurs in FD associated with both Gb3 and Lyso-Gb3 accumulation leading to tissue damage through vasculopathy, endothelial free radical formation, and altered oxidative responses[23,24].
Vasculopathy and chronic inflammation
Tissue deposition of glycolipids is not considered a sufficient explanation of the pathophysiology of FD. Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 can also induce a chronic inflammatory state leading to vascular damage, as previously reviewed[25]. The classical natural T killer cells recognize both Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 as self-antigens presented by the major histocompatibility complex to antigen-presenting cells[26]. Recognition of these glycolipids induces the release of various proinflammatory cytokines such as interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukins 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, and 17[27,28]. This proinflammatory status in patients with FD leads to endothelial cell activation, inducing a cascade of effects that lead to a prothrombotic state characterized by dysfunctional platelets, higher secretion of von Willebrand factor, increased release of microparticles, and the activation of plasminogen[29-32]. Moreover, increased expression of endothelial adhesion molecules has also been reported[33,34].
Ca2+-activated K+ channels
The endothelium controls vascular diameter through the contractile status of the smooth muscle of blood vessels. This process is mediated by the release of nitric oxide, prostaglandins, and the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). Endothelial hyperpolarization responses are mediated by Ca2+-activated K+ channels (KCa) in response to calcium mobilization under shear stress stimulation. The hyperpolarization current is then transmitted to the medial muscular layer, inducing muscle relaxation and vasodilation. Gb3 accumulation reduces both KCa expression and function. Downregulation of pathways that control KCa expression is observed, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and activating protein-1
Lyso-Gb3 and the medial muscular layer
Aerts et al. described higher concentrations of plasmatic lyso-Gb3 in patients with FD[37]. A second hypothesis of vascular damage in FD considers that the circulating lyso-Gb3 effect on the arterial medial layer is the main and primary event, inducing smooth muscle hypertrophy, increased shear stress, and vessel lumen reduction[38]. It is hypothesized that the increased shear stress induces the upregulation of angiotensin II; this molecule interacts with the angiotensin 1 receptor (AT1) to produce a complex cascade of events including the overexpression of adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines. Moreover, AT1 not only induces a proinflammatory effect on leucocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, but also reduces nitric oxide formation with a subsequent increase of reactive oxygen species[39].
After binding to the AT1 receptor, angiotensin II activates integrin-mediated signaling and overexpression of the transforming growth factor beta, thereby inducing alterations not only of extracellular matrix quality and quantity, but also of the cytoskeletal protein composition and filament organization. These changes decrease vessel compliance. This inflammatory process, along with oxidative stress, weakens the vessel wall as it activates protease-mediated extracellular matrix degradation and apoptosis of smooth muscle cells. Progressive weakening of the vessel wall results in elongation, dilatation, and aneurysm formation[38,40,41] [Figure 1].
Basilar artery dolichoectasia
Basilar artery diameter is significantly enlarged in FD patients[42-44]. It was postulated that a low sympathetic innervation of intracranial vessels in the posterior circulation is the reason for the selective involvement of this vessel. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia is an additional risk factor for ischemic brain lesions and small vessel disease[45]. Brain infarctions in patients with basilar artery dolichoectasia may develop due to major distortion and obstruction of perforating arteries, thrombosis, and emboli arising from this dolichoectatic vessel[46].
Cardioembolic stroke
In addition to the previously described mechanisms, stroke in the distribution of large vessels is predominantly due to cardiac embolism, mainly due to arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. Cardiac involvement is the main cause of mortality in FD[47]. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a hallmark of FD and evolves into myocardial replacement fibrosis[48]. With FD progression, a reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is seen, resulting in a lower cardiac output[49,50]. The severe involvement of the conduction system is the cause of bradycardia, asystole, episodes of ventricular tachycardia, and intermittent atrial fibrillation, all of which markedly increase the risk of sudden death and cardioembolic stroke[51].
Why are females affected in FD?
The reason why females with FD are affected has been reviewed[52] and the authors indicated that symptomatic females primarily secrete the mature 46KDa enzyme, with only small amounts of the mannose 6-phosphorylated form. Therefore, the capacity for enzyme cross-correction of affected cells is limited[53].
A second possible explanation is that α-GAL A released by the mixed cellular population of the female mosaic is more susceptible to dephosphorylation by plasma phosphatases[54].
PREVALENCE OF STROKE IN FD
Cerebrovascular manifestations in FD are mainly ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Hemorrhagic strokes and microbleeds are less frequent, while cerebral venous thrombosis and subarachnoid hemorrhages are only occasionally seen[55,56].
Studies on the prevalence and incidence of stroke in FD yielded variable results[57], likely reflecting differences in genetic variants, sample size, gender, and age of the investigated cohort, as well as in the imaging methods used in the investigation.
The first published studies regarding stroke prevalence in FD were conducted in the 1990s. Morgan et al. analyzed 12 patients with FD and found that three of them had had a stroke (25%)[58]. Grewal identified eight patients with stroke in a group of 33 patients with FD (24%, age range: 6-64 years). Among these patients, stroke involved small perforating arteries and was evenly distributed between the anterior and the posterior circulation[59].
A retrospective study of central nervous system involvement in FD, including 43 patients, reported a prevalence of stroke of 24% in males (mean age: 33 years) and 28% in females (mean age: 53 years). Moreover, TIA was described in 20% of males and 17% of females. Lacunar infarcts involving both the anterior and the posterior circulation were the predominant type of stroke, while only one female suffered a hemorrhagic stroke[60].
In Australian patients with FD, a prevalence of stroke of 31% in males and 5% in females was reported[61]. A retrospective analysis of a Dutch cohort of patients with FD from a single center in Amsterdam yielded a prevalence of stroke or asymptomatic lacunar infarcts detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 32% (n = 13, median age: 56 years) in females and 48% (n = 12, median age: 46 years) in males[62]. A retrospective Japanese study including 65 patients identified ten subjects (15%, 7 males and 3 females) with ischemic strokes[63].
In 2001, MacDermot et al. analyzed 60 women with FD and identified 4 patients with stroke and 17 with TIA (combined prevalence of 21.5%)[64]. In a cross-sectional study, the same authors reported a cohort of
With the goal of increasing the sample size, several studies used data from collaborative international registries, such as the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS) and the Fabry Registry (FR). In 2005, Mehta and Ginsberg evaluated the prevalence of stroke and TIA among 388 patients in FOS; the prevalence was higher in females (15.7%) than in males (11.1%)[67]. About half of these patients suffered a stroke or a TIA at an age younger than 44 years.
A later study identified that 91 (13.2%) of the 688 patients (330 males, 358 females) registered in FOS by March 2005 had suffered a stroke or TIA. The prevalence of ischemic strokes among males and females registered in FOS was 20.1 and 7.8 times higher than expected in a comparable general population, respectively[68].
A more recent FOS study including 1,453 patients identified that cerebrovascular events were almost equally frequent in males (25%; n = 172/699) and females (21%; n = 159/754)[47].
A study analyzing the FR cohort included 2,446 patients. Overall stroke prevalence was 5.6% (n = 138): 6.9% in males, with a mean age of 39 years, and 4.9% in females, with a mean age of 45 years. The prevalence of hemorrhagic strokes was 13.2%, whereas the prevalence of ischemic strokes was 86.8%. For ischemic strokes, up to 70% were lacunar. Moreover, 21.7% of the patients who had a stroke were younger than 30 years old. Most patients had had a stroke before any cardiac or renal event, or it was their only clinical manifestation. In addition, 38% of females and 50% of males experienced their first stroke before being diagnosed with FD. Thus, most patients had either not experienced other major complications or had not been diagnosed with FD before their stroke[69].
Atrial Fibrillation in FD
Atrial fibrillation incidence in FD is variable depending on the choice of diagnostic modality, with 12-lead ECG and Holter monitoring showing lower detection rates (2.9%-10% per year) compared with higher rates (19%-31% per year) on continuous rhythm monitoring[70].
The worldwide incidence and prevalence of AF is increasing in the general population. Higher rates of AF were observed due to advancing age, improved survival from co-existing disease, and increasing co-morbidity[71]. These same drivers are shared in those who have FD, including increasing age, improved survival with ERT, but concurrently an increasing number of FD co-morbidities[70].
SCREENING OF FD IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE
The prevalence of FD in young patients with stroke has been an area of great interest. However, the studies yielded conflicting results, most likely due to the selection criteria of patients (cryptogenic strokes vs. all types of strokes or the inclusion of white matter lesions), as well as the genetic data interpretation.
Initially, the number of patients with FD that could be identified among young patients with strokes was overestimated because benign variants or variants of unclear significance were erroneously interpreted[72,73].
In a prospective study, Rolfs et al. analyzed 721 patients aged 18 to 55 years with cryptogenic strokes in Germany. FD was estimated to be the etiological factor in 4.9% of males and 2.4% of females. Nevertheless, the pathogenic variants were not reported[72]. Multiple investigations followed the study of Rolfs, but none of them could reproduce its results.
A meta-analysis included 8,302 patients who participated in nine studies (four about strokes of undetermined origin and five about strokes of all etiologies). Eight studies limited the age to young patients (18-55 years old), and the ninth study did not have an age limit. The investigators concluded that FD may explain approximately 1% of all strokes in the young population, including 3%-5% of cryptogenic strokes[73]. The study with no age limit, which included all types of strokes as well as white matter lesions, found no patients with FD at all[74]. An important limitation of this meta-analysis is that the authors did not critically analyze the genetic variants reported in the individual studies, which in many cases corresponded to benign variants or variants of unclear significance[73].
The Stroke in Young Fabry Patients (SIFAP) study is the largest multicentric observational study ever performed and included 5,023 young patients with stroke (both cryptogenic and non-cryptogenic). Definitive FD was detected in 0.5% of patients (n = 27). Nevertheless, some of the reported variants are now still considered benign or likely benign[12]. None of the patients presented signs and/or symptoms of classical FD.
In recent years, significant improvement was made in the genotype-phenotype correlation of young patients with stroke included in screening studies of FD, and as a consequence, a lower prevalence of 0.1%-0.3% was estimated[75,76]. This prevalence may be higher in young patients with either cryptogenic or recurrent stroke[75].
A prospective, multicentric study of stroke and FD in young adults (18-55 years old) included 311 patients with either cryptogenic or non-cryptogenic strokes. One female (0.3% of the total group, 1% of the cryptogenic ischemic strokes) had the pathogenic variant c.888G>A/p.Met296Ile/Exon 6 on the GAL gene. Her only other manifestation of FD was angiokeratoma[75].
An additional systematic review included screening studies published between 1995 and 2017. The aim of the review was not only to present the prevalence of FD in the mentioned population, but also to reanalyze the genetic data to exclude benign or likely benign variants, and perform genotype-phenotype correlations. Data from 3,904 males and 2,074 females were analyzed. In males, the investigators found a pre-analysis prevalence of 0.67% (n = 26) of patients with FD; among them, 21 had either benign variants or variants of unknown significance, including p.D313Y, p.A143T, p.E66Q, and g.1136C>T(5’-44C>T). Therefore, the true prevalence of FD dropped to 0.13%. Among the 5 males with pathogenic variants, 3 exhibited the Type 1 phenotype while 2 displayed the Type 2 phenotype. Similarly, a prevalence of 1.11% of patients with FD was found in females (n = 23), but when the benign variants were excluded, only 3 presented pathogenic variants with the Type 1 phenotype and the actual prevalence dropped to 0.14%, similar to that in males[76]. The authors found that most FD patients identified in stroke clinics had the Classic phenotype and, therefore, should have been diagnosed earlier by their pediatricians and family doctors[76].
Moreover, similar clinical characteristics of stroke patients were identified in the Fabry Registry. When the most recent available follow-up examination after their first stroke was analyzed, 59.8% of males and 25.5% of females had stage 3 to 5 chronic kidney disease. Moreover, 66.1% of males and 59.5% of females had left ventricular hypertrophy. These data also suggest that most patients had type 1 phenotype[69].
A recent study evaluated 172 patients with ischemic stroke using an exome-based panel of 349 genes and identified pathogenic GLA variants in 2 patients (1.2%) with known FD[77].
All these studies demonstrate the need for a careful assessment of screening results based on the diagnostic methods used, a detailed interpretation of genetic data, and recognition of population selection criteria. Nevertheless, the interpretation of screening results remains a controversial issue, as demonstrated by a recent meta-analysis indicating that p.D313Y might induce an atypical neurological phenotype in patients with FD[78]. In our opinion, the investigation into FD is warranted in young patients with cryptogenic stroke.
NEUROIMAGING FINDINGS IN FD
Stroke and white matter hyperintensities [Figure 2A and B]
Ischemic strokes and TIAs are the most common cerebrovascular manifestations in FD and can be attributed to either large or, more frequently, small vessel disease, with cortical and subcortical locations, respectively. Some authors describe that stroke in FD similarly affects both the anterior and the posterior circulation[55,59], while others underline a predominant involvement of the posterior circulation[79].
Hemorrhagic stroke is a rare complication in FD, accounting for about 10% of stroke events, with a predilection for male patients and mostly associated with hypertension or end-stage renal failure. On the contrary, chronic cerebral microbleeds are more common, affecting 11% to 30% of FD patients[80] [Figure 2C]. They can be detected in brain MRI using echo gradient-weighted images, T2-weighted and susceptibility-weighted imaging[81]. A study of 36 adult patients with FD identified that 44.4% without dialysis or previous strokes had MRI evidence of small vessel disease, and 11% of them showed cerebral microbleeds[82].
Figure 2. Brain MR T2 Flair axial reconstruction in a 36-year-old man with Fabry Disease showed white matter hyperintensities located bilaterally in the (A) periventricular and (B) pontine regions; (C) SWI axial recconstruction identified punctate microbleeds (black arrows) in the right thalannus, right frontal and right occipital lobes; (D) Intracranial time of flight MR angiography sequence coronal reconstruction revealed the presence of mild elongation and tortuosity of the basilar artery. MR: Magnetic resonance; SWI: susceptibility weighted imaging.
Small vessel disease is commonly seen in patients with FD, manifested as subcortical stroke and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) [Figure 2A and B]. The latter represents the most frequent brain imaging feature of FD and indicates lesions not referable to focal acute cerebrovascular events[83]. WMHs could range from small, scattered, and punctuate T2-weighted hyperintense foci to bilateral diffuse, patchy, and confluent lesions. WMH occurrence is similar in males and females, with no predilection for a specific brain region[81,84]. Autopsies performed in patients with FD revealed that deep WMHs are either lacunar infarctions or are associated with small arterioles narrowing[85].
Marchesoni et al. identified asymptomatic WMHs in 7 children with FD (15.9%), compared with 3 children (6.5%) in an aged-matched control group (P = 0.01). Brain abnormalities revealed deep gray matter and infratentorial involvement[86].
WMHs are not specific and may be misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS) or other demyelinating conditions[87]. In a study comparing brain MRI from FD patients vs. matched patients with MS, WMHs involving the juxtacortical and infratentorial regions as well as the corpus callosum were more frequently observed in MS patients[88]. Moreover, the history of multiorgan involvement, the absence of oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid, the relative sparing of corpus callosum, and the lack of spinal cord lesions are useful in differentiating FD from MS[89,90].
Perivascular spaces
MRI-visible perivascular spaces (PVS) seem to be a promising marker of small vessel disease associated with possible impaired interstitial fluid drainage in FD. In a study including 33 patients with FD (median age: 44 years; 44.1% male) and 20 healthy controls (median age: 33.5 years; 50% male), FD was associated with more severe basal ganglia PVS and a higher total PVS score. Impaired interstitial fluid drainage might be a newly recognized mechanism of white matter injury in FD[91].
Pulvinar sign
The symmetric hyperintensity of the lateral pulvinar nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted brain MRI is known as the pulvinar sign (PS). The pathogenesis of the PS in FD is still unclear and may represent dystrophic calcifications, likely due to chronic regional hyperperfusion[92,93]. It has been initially described as a common neuroradiologic sign in patients with FD[92,94]; nevertheless, PS is not a specific finding and it has been reported in other conditions, including metabolic disorders (Krabbe or Tay-Sachs disease), Fahr disease, disturbances of the calcium-phosphorus metabolism, central nervous system infections, or after chemoradiation therapy[95]. In a recent study, PS was detected in only 4 of 133 patients with FD (3.0%); all the patients were adult males with chronic renal failure on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)[95]. These results suggest that the true incidence of PS is considerably lower than previously thought. In addition, the PS has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of FD, is not modified by ERT, and is not associated with any specific FD genotype[94,95].
Vertebrobasilar artery involvement
Alterations of the posterior circulation system include tortuosity, diffuse ectasia, elongation, and/or focal aneurismal dilatation involving the vertebral and basilar arteries [Figure 2D][96]. The underlying mechanisms of such abnormal vessel dilatation have been described in the corresponding section of this review. It is worth noting that the prevalence of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia has also been described in young patients with other uncommon causes of acute strokes[97].
Recommended MRI sequences
MRI sequences suggested include T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and
In adults with FD, due to the higher prevalence of strokes in comparison to the general population and the presence of silent lesions, a consensus guideline proposes to perform a brain MRI every three years in all males at baseline and in females over 30 years old[98]. By contrast, given the rarity of stroke in the pediatric population with FD, the latest consensus guidelines advise against performing a brain MRI as baseline practice in children, except in cases with neurological symptoms[99].
Computed tomography scans may be used in the acute setting or when MRI is contraindicated.
Advanced imaging techniques
Quantitative volumetric MRI studies evaluate the presence of brain-tissue volume loss in FD patients with mild-to-moderate central nervous system involvement. Reduced grey matter density has been recently reported at the level of the thalami and hippocampus, bilaterally, reflecting direct neuronal involvement independent from vascular pathology[100].
Diffusion tensor imaging has been shown to detect brain tissue alterations, allowing for an accurate quantification of microstructural white matter changes. FD patients, including those without white matter lesions seen on conventional MRIs, may present an elevated total brain parenchymal diffusion constant compared to controls. Increased mean diffusivity values in FD patients were found in the temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes. This increase, presumably due to an elevated water content of brain tissue, may be identified independently from white matter lesions and could be interpreted as a biomarker of early stages of microvascular injury[101,102].
A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study was performed in FD patients using a multi-voxel analysis, with the objective of investigating changes in the N-acetylaspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr) ratio indicating possible neuronal degeneration and loss. FD patients showed a diffuse reduction of the NAA/Cr ratio, affecting both cortical and subcortical structures. These alterations were independent of the presence of WMH and were attributed to a possible metabolic dysfunction, secondary to Gb3 neuronal accumulation rather than a vascular alteration[103].
The connectome analysis of brain networks in patients with FD, using diffusion and resting-state functional MRI data, revealed both a structural disconnection (due to mild but widespread axonal damage) and a functional reorganization, associated with cognitive performances[104].
Future longitudinal studies on volumetric MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy are necessary to elucidate the possible presence of brain volume differences, microstructural changes, and metabolic dysfunction in FD.
COGNITIVE INVOLVEMENT AND PARKINSONISM IN FD
Cognitive involvement, ranging from mild reduced attention and executive dysfunction to full dementia, was identified in some patients with FD. It predominates in patients with more severe disease and a history of cerebrovascular disease[105-109]. The studies evaluating this problem have yielded conflicting results; while several investigations identified cognitive defects with male predominance[110,111], other investigators failed to identify cognitive decline in FD[79,111-115]. Moreover, executive dysfunction was identified in patients with FD, but differences with control population disappeared after controlling for depression[116,117]. Differences in these results are likely due to the characteristics of the evaluated cohort regarding gender, associated cerebrovascular disease, and depression, as well as the varied neuropsychological techniques used in each study. All these variables need to be controlled in future prospective studies of cognition in FD.
Parkinsonism is rarely seen in patients with FD, particularly in the absence of cerebral small vessel disease. Bradykinesia and impaired fine manual movements have been reported in both males and females with pathogenic GLA variants[118].
Moreover, in autopsies series, the storage of glycosphingolipids was documented in neuronal and glial tissue including substance nigra[119].
Nevertheless, it is still not possible to ascertain whether this PD phenotype is related to Gb3 deposition versus cerebrovascular lesions in the nigrostriatal network and the simultaneous presence of the two mechanisms may be considered[120].
TREATMENT
Whether ERT is beneficial for the prevention of stroke is still a controversial topic. It was initially considered that ERT was ineffective in reducing the risk of stroke, as it does not cross the blood-brain barrier. Nevertheless, autopsies performed in FD patients on ERT treatment indicate an almost complete clearance of endothelial glycolipids, but persistent storage in smooth muscle vascular cells, in addition to intimal fibrous thickening and adventitial fibrosis[108,121]. It should be stressed that these patients were severely affected by their disease, and ERT was started very late, possibly at an irreversible stage of vascular damage.
Recent studies suggest a protective effect of ERT after an initial latency period of 6 months[122]. In a meta-analysis including seven cohort studies and two randomized, controlled studies (7,513 participants: 1,471 on ERT vs. 6,042 on native treatment), the stroke recurrence ratio in the ERT treatment group (including both agalsidase alfa and beta) was 8.2% vs. 16% in the native treatment group (P = 0.03)[123].
It is worth noting that ERT has been shown to reduce both the burden of disease[124,125] and the risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke[126]. The beneficial effect of ER, in patients naïve to specific treatment, on stabilizing and improving cardiomyopathy, especially with prompt initiation of therapy, also has a preventive effect on cardioembolic stroke[127].
In patients with FD, classical cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, sedentarism, and hypertension) should be treated intensively, both for primary and secondary prevention[128]. We recommend aspirin or clopidogrel in patients who suffered an ischemic stroke or TIA. Although no clinical trials are available regarding primary prevention, we also indicate antithrombotic medications in FD patients with MRI lesions Fazekas grade 2 or 3[129].
We usually use clopidogrel when aspirin is not tolerated and recommend statins in primary and secondary prevention for their pleiotropic effects[17,98,130].
Anticoagulation is reserved for patients with confirmed atrial fibrillation or cardioembolic stroke.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to conception and design, and participated in original draft writing and final revision: Moreno-Martínez D, León-Cejas L, Reisin R
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. Mehta A, Beck M, Eyskens F, et al. Fabry disease: a review of current management strategies. QJM 2010;103:641-59.
3. Mehta A, Ricci R, Widmer U, et al. Fabry disease defined: baseline clinical manifestations of 366 patients in the Fabry Outcome Survey. Eur J Clin Invest 2004;34:236-42.
4. AADELFA (Asociación Argentina de estudio de enfermedad de Fabry y otras enfermedades lisosomales). [Evaluation of patients with Fabry disease in Argentina]. Medicina 2010;70:37-43. (in Spanish).
5. Giugliani R, Niu D, Ramaswami U, et al. A 15-year perspective of the fabry outcome survey. J Inborn Errors Metab Screen 2016;4:e160041.
6. Spada M, Pagliardini S, Yasuda M, et al. High incidence of later-onset fabry disease revealed by newborn screening. Am J Hum Genet 2006;79:31-40.
7. Lin HY, Chong KW, Hsu JH, et al. High incidence of the cardiac variant of Fabry disease revealed by newborn screening in the Taiwan Chinese population. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:450-6.
8. Marchesoni CL, Roa N, Pardal AM, et al. Misdiagnosis in Fabry disease. J Pediatr 2010;156:828-31.
9. Reisin R, Perrin A, García-Pavía P. Time delays in the diagnosis and treatment of Fabry disease. Int J Clin Pract 2017;71:e12914.
10. von Scheidt W, Eng CM, Fitzmaurice TF, et al. An atypical variant of Fabry’s disease with manifestations confined to the myocardium. N Engl J Med 1991;324:395-9.
11. Nakao S, Kodama C, Takenaka T, et al. Fabry disease: detection of undiagnosed hemodialysis patients and identification of a “renal variant” phenotype. Kidney Int 2003;64:801-7.
12. Rolfs A, Fazekas F, Grittner U, et al. Stroke in Young Fabry Patients (sifap) Investigators. Acute cerebrovascular disease in the young: the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients study. Stroke 2013;44:340-9.
13. Wanner C, Arad M, Baron R, et al. European expert consensus statement on therapeutic goals in Fabry disease. Mol Genet Metab 2018;124:189-203.
14. Schiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin HA 3rd, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:2743-9.
15. Eng CM, Guffon N, Wilcox WR, et al. International Collaborative Fabry Disease Study Group. Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A replacement therapy in Fabry’s disease. N Engl J Med 2001;345:9-16.
16. Germain DP, Hughes DA, Nicholls K, et al. Treatment of Fabry’s disease with the pharmacologic chaperone migalastat. N Engl J Med 2016;375:545-55.
18. Moore DF, Kaneski CR, Askari H, Schiffmann R. The cerebral vasculopathy of Fabry disease. J Neurol Sci 2007;257:258-63.
19. Joly DA, Grünfeld JP. 3-Nitrotyrosine as a biomarker for vascular involvement in Fabry disease. Kidney Int 2014;86:5-7.
20. Shu L, Vivekanandan-Giri A, Pennathur S, et al. Establishing 3-nitrotyrosine as a biomarker for the vasculopathy of Fabry disease. Kidney Int 2014;86:58-66.
21. Hilz MJ, Kolodny EH, Brys M, Stemper B, Haendl T, Marthol H. Reduced cerebral blood flow velocity and impaired cerebral autoregulation in patients with Fabry disease. J Neurol 2004;251:564-70.
22. Moore DF, Altarescu G, Ling GSF, et al. Elevated cerebral blood flow velocities in Fabry disease with reversal after enzyme replacement. Stroke 2002;33:525-31.
23. Biancini GB, Vanzin CS, Rodrigues DB, et al. Globotriaosylceramide is correlated with oxidative stress and inflammation in Fabry patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1822:226-32.
24. Simoncini C, Torri S, Montano V, et al. Oxidative stress biomarkers in Fabry disease: is there a room for them? J Neurol 2020;267:3741-52.
25. Rozenfeld P, Feriozzi S. Contribution of inflammatory pathways to Fabry disease pathogenesis. Mol Genet Metab 2017;122:19-27.
26. Spada FM, Koezuka Y, Porcelli SA. CD1d-restricted recognition of synthetic glycolipid antigens by human natural killer T cells. J Exp Med 1998;188:1529-34.
27. Gumperz JE, Miyake S, Yamamura T, Brenner MB. Functionally distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells revealed by CD1d tetramer staining. J Exp Med 2002;195:625-36.
28. O’Reilly V, Zeng SG, Bricard G, et al. Distinct and overlapping effector functions of expanded human CD4+, CD8α+ and CD4-CD8α- invariant natural killer T cells. PLoS One 2011;6:e28648.
29. Reisin RC, Rozenfeld P, Bonardo P. Fabry disease patients have an increased risk of stroke in the COVID-19 ERA. A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2020;144:110282.
31. Biancini GB, Jacques CE, Hammerschmidt T, et al. Biomolecules damage and redox status abnormalities in Fabry patients before and during enzyme replacement therapy. Clin Chim Acta 2016;461:41-6.
32. Kang JJ, Kaissarian NM, Desch KC, et al. α-galactosidase A deficiency promotes von Willebrand factor secretion in models of Fabry disease. Kidney Int 2019;95:149-59.
33. DeGraba T, Azhar S, Dignat-George F, et al. Profile of endothelial and leukocyte activation in Fabry patients. Ann Neurol 2000;47:229-33.
34. Shen JS, Meng XL, Moore DF, et al. Globotriaosylceramide induces oxidative stress and up-regulates cell adhesion molecule expression in Fabry disease endothelial cells. Mol Genet Metab 2008;95:163-8.
35. Park S, Kim JA, Joo KY, et al. Globotriaosylceramide leads to KCa3.1 channel dysfunction: a new insight into endothelial dysfunction in Fabry disease. Cardiovasc Res 2011;89:290-9.
36. Choi S, Kim JA, Na HY, et al. Globotriaosylceramide induces lysosomal degradation of endothelial KCa3.1 in fabry disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014;34:81-9.
37. Aerts JM, Groener JE, Kuiper S, et al. Elevated globotriaosylsphingosine is a hallmark of Fabry disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2812-7.
38. Rombach SM, Twickler TB, Aerts JM, Linthorst GE, Wijburg FA, Hollak CE. Vasculopathy in patients with Fabry disease: current controversies and research directions. Mol Genet Metab 2010;99:99-108.
39. Dandona P, Dhindsa S, Ghanim H, Chaudhuri A. Angiotensin II and inflammation: the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade. J Hum Hypertens 2007;21:20-7.
40. Cavanagh EM, Ferder M, Inserra F, Ferder L. Angiotensin II, mitochondria, cytoskeletal, and extracellular matrix connections: an integrating viewpoint. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;296:H550-8.
41. Mishra V, Banerjee A, Gandhi AB, et al. Stroke and Fabry disease: a review of literature. Cureus 2020;12:e12083.
42. Lam YLT, Sheng B, Kwok HM, Yu ELM, Ma KFJ. Basilar artery diameter as neuroimaging biomarker in Chinese Fabry disease patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023;18:186.
43. Uçeyler N, Homola GA, Guerrero González H, et al. Increased arterial diameters in the posterior cerebral circulation in men with Fabry disease. PLoS One 2014;9:e87054.
44. Fellgiebel A, Keller I, Martus P, et al. Basilar artery diameter is a potential screening tool for Fabry disease in young stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;31:294-9.
45. Pico F, Labreuche J, Touboul PJ, Leys D, Amarenco P. Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and small-vessel disease in stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2005;57:472-9.
46. Zhang DP, Yin S, Zhang HL, Li D, Song B, Liang JX. Association between intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and cerebral small vessel disease and its underlying mechanisms. J Stroke 2020;22:173-84.
47. Mehta A, Clarke JT, Giugliani R, et al. FOS Investigators. Natural course of Fabry disease: changing pattern of causes of death in FOS - Fabry Outcome Survey. J Med Genet 2009;46:548-52.
48. Hagège A, Réant P, Habib G, et al. Fabry disease in cardiology practice: Literature review and expert point of view. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2019;112:278-87.
49. Weidemann F, Breunig F, Beer M, et al. The variation of morphological and functional cardiac manifestation in Fabry disease: potential implications for the time course of the disease. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1221-7.
50. Kampmann C, Wiethoff CM, Perrot A, Beck M, Dietz R, Osterziel KJ. The heart in Anderson Fabry disease. Z Kardiol 2002;91:786-95.
51. Weidemann F, Maier SKG, Störk S, et al. Usefulness of an implantable loop recorder to detect clinically relevant arrhythmias in patients with advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2016;118:264-74.
52. Beck M, Cox TM. Comment: why are females with Fabry disease affected? Mol Genet Metab Rep 2019;21:100529.
53. Fuller M, Mellett N, Hein LK, Brooks DA, Meikle PJ. Absence of α-galactosidase cross-correction in Fabry heterozygote cultured skin fibroblasts. Mol Genet Metab 2015;114:268-73.
54. Dobyns WB, Filauro A, Tomson BN, et al. Inheritance of most X-linked traits is not dominant or recessive, just X-linked. Am J Med Genet A 2004;129A:136-43.
55. Kolodny E, Fellgiebel A, Hilz MJ, et al. Cerebrovascular involvement in Fabry disease: current status of knowledge. Stroke 2015;46:302-13.
56. Mitsias P, Levine SR. Cerebrovascular complications of Fabry’s disease. Ann Neurol 1996;40:8-17.
57. Mehta A, Hughes DA. Fabry disease. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1292/. [Last accessed on 21 March 2024].
58. Morgan SH, Rudge P, Smith SJ, et al. The neurological complications of Anderson-Fabry disease (alpha-galactosidase A deficiency) - investigation of symptomatic and presymptomatic patients. Q J Med 1990;75:491-507.
60. Buechner S, Moretti M, Burlina AP, et al. Central nervous system involvement in Anderson-Fabry disease: a clinical and MRI retrospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1249-54.
61. Galanos J, Nicholls K, Grigg L, Kiers L, Crawford A, Becker G. Clinical features of Fabry’s disease in Australian patients. Intern Med J 2002;32:575-84.
62. Vedder AC, Linthorst GE, van Breemen MJ, et al. The Dutch Fabry cohort: diversity of clinical manifestations and Gb3 levels. J Inherit Metab Dis 2007;30:68-78.
63. Utsumi K, Ueda K, Watanabe M, et al. Thrombosis in Japanese patients with Fabry disease. J Neurol Sci 2009;283:83-5.
64. MacDermot KD, Holmes A, Miners AH. Anderson-Fabry disease: clinical manifestations and impact of disease in a cohort of 60 obligate carrier females. J Med Genet 2001;38:769-75.
65. MacDermot KD, Holmes A, Miners AH. Natural history of Fabry disease in affected males and obligate carrier females. J Inherit Metab Dis 2001;24:13-4.
66. Gupta S, Ries M, Kotsopoulos S, Schiffmann R. The relationship of vascular glycolipid storage to clinical manifestations of Fabry disease: a cross-sectional study of a large cohort of clinically affected heterozygous women. Medicine 2005;84:261-8.
67. Mehta A, Ginsberg L. FOS Investigators. Natural history of the cerebrovascular complications of Fabry disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2005;94:24-7.
68. Ginsberg L. Nervous system manifestations of Fabry disease: data from FOS - the Fabry Outcome Survey. In: Mehta A, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G, editors. Fabry disease: perspectives from 5 years of FOS. Oxford: Oxford PharmaGenesis; 2006. Chapter 23.
69. Sims K, Politei J, Banikazemi M, Lee P. Stroke in Fabry disease frequently occurs before diagnosis and in the absence of other clinical events: natural history data from the Fabry Registry. Stroke 2009;40:788-94.
70. Vijapurapu R, Roy A, Demetriades P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and clinical risk predictors of atrial fibrillation and permanent pacemaker implantation for bradycardia in Fabry disease. Open Heart 2023;10:e002316.
71. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014;129:837-47.
72. Rolfs A, Böttcher T, Zschiesche M, et al. Prevalence of Fabry disease in patients with cryptogenic stroke: a prospective study. Lancet 2005;366:1794-6.
73. Shi Q, Chen J, Pongmoragot J, Lanthier S, Saposnik G. Prevalence of Fabry disease in stroke patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:985-92.
74. Marquardt L, Baker R, Segal H, et al. Fabry disease in unselected patients with TIA or stroke: population-based study. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:1427-32.
75. Reisin RC, Mazziotti J, Cejas LL, et al. AISYF Investigators. Prevalence of Fabry disease in young patients with stroke in Argentina. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:575-82.
76. Doheny D, Srinivasan R, Pagant S, Chen B, Yasuda M, Desnick RJ. Fabry Disease: prevalence of affected males and heterozygotes with pathogenic GLA mutations identified by screening renal, cardiac and stroke clinics, 1995-2017. J Med Genet 2018;55:261-8.
77. Härtl J, Hartberger J, Wunderlich S, et al. Regeneron Genetics Center. Exome-based gene panel analysis in a cohort of acute juvenile ischemic stroke patients:relevance of NOTCH3 and GLA variants. J Neurol 2023;270:1501-11.
78. Palaiodimou L, Stefanou MI, Bakola E, et al. D313Y variant in Fabry disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2022;99:e2188-200.
80. Kono Y, Wakabayashi T, Kobayashi M, et al. Characteristics of cerebral microbleeds in patients with Fabry disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:1320-5.
81. Cocozza S, Russo C, Pontillo G, Pisani A, Brunetti A. Neuroimaging in Fabry disease: current knowledge and future directions. Insights Imaging 2018;9:1077-88.
82. Reisin RC, Romero C, Marchesoni C, et al. Brain MRI findings in patients with Fabry disease. J Neurol Sci 2011;305:41-4.
83. Brooks JBB, Fragoso YD. Neurological manifestations in Fabry disease. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2016;3:228.
84. Fellgiebel A, Müller MJ, Mazanek M, Baron K, Beck M, Stoeter P. White matter lesion severity in male and female patients with Fabry disease. Neurology 2005;65:600-2.
85. Kaye EM, Kolodny EH, Logigian EL, Ullman MD. Nervous system involvement in Fabry's disease: clinicopathological and biochemical correlation. Ann Neurol 1988;23:505-9.
86. Marchesoni C, Cisneros E, Pfister P, et al. Brain MRI findings in children and adolescents with Fabry disease. J Neurol Sci 2018;395:131-4.
87. Shribman SE, Shah AR, Werring DJ, Cockerell OC. Fabry disease mimicking multiple sclerosis: lessons from two case reports. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:170-5.
88. Rath J, Foesleitner O, Haider L, et al. Neuroradiological differentiation of white matter lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis and Fabry disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022;17:37.
89. Cocozza S, Olivo G, Riccio E, et al. Corpus callosum involvement: a useful clue for differentiating Fabry Disease from Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroradiology 2017;59:563-70.
90. Böttcher T, Rolfs A, Tanislav C, et al. Fabry disease - underestimated in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis? PLoS One 2013;8:e71894.
91. Lyndon D, Davagnanam I, Wilson D, et al. MRI-visible perivascular spaces as an imaging biomarker in Fabry disease. J Neurol 2021;268:872-8.
92. Moore DF, Ye F, Schiffmann R, Butman JA. Increased signal intensity in the pulvinar on T1-weighted images: a pathognomonic MR imaging sign of Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1096-101.
93. Takanashi J, Barkovich AJ, Dillon WP, Sherr EH, Hart KA, Packman S. T1 hyperintensity in the pulvinar: key imaging feature for diagnosis of Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:916-21.
94. Burlina AP, Manara R, Caillaud C, et al. The pulvinar sign: frequency and clinical correlations in Fabry disease. J Neurol 2008;255:738-44.
95. Cocozza S, Russo C, Pisani A, et al. Redefining the pulvinar sign in Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2264-9.
96. Manara R, Carlier RY, Righetto S, et al. Basilar artery changes in Fabry disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:531-6.
97. Fazekas F, Enzinger C, Schmidt R, et al; SIFAP 1 Investigators. Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings fail to suspect Fabry disease in young patients with an acute cerebrovascular event. Stroke 2015;46:1548-53.
98. Ortiz A, Germain DP, Desnick RJ, et al. Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab 2018;123:416-27.
99. Germain DP, Fouilhoux A, Decramer S, et al. Consensus recommendations for diagnosis, management and treatment of Fabry disease in paediatric patients. Clin Genet 2019;96:107-17.
100. Pontillo G, Cocozza S, Brunetti A, et al. Reduced intracranial volume in Fabry disease: evidence of abnormal neurodevelopment? Front Neurol 2018;9:672.
101. Paavilainen T, Lepomäki V, Saunavaara J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and brain volumetry in Fabry disease patients. Neuroradiology 2013;55:551-8.
102. Fellgiebel A, Mazanek M, Whybra C, et al. Pattern of microstructural brain tissue alterations in Fabry disease: a diffusion-tensor imaging study. J Neurol 2006;253:780-7.
103. Tedeschi G, Bonavita S, Banerjee TK, Virta A, Schiffmann R. Diffuse central neuronal involvement in Fabry disease: a proton MRS imaging study. Neurology 1999;52:1663-7.
104. Gabusi I, Pontillo G, Petracca M, et al. Structural disconnection and functional reorganization in Fabry disease: a multimodal MRI study. Brain Commun 2022;4:fcac187.
105. Elstein D, Doniger GM, Altarescu G. Cognitive testing in Fabry disease: pilot using a brief computerized assessment tool. Isr Med Assoc J 2012;14:624-8.
106. Segal P, Kohn Y, Pollak Y, Altarescu G, Galili-Weisstub E, Raas-Rothschild A. Psychiatric and cognitive profile in Anderson-Fabry patients: a preliminary study. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010;33:429-36.
107. Mendez MF, Stanley TM, Medel NM, Li Z, Tedesco DT. The vascular dementia of Fabry’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1997;8:252-7.
108. Okeda R, Nisihara M. An autopsy case of Fabry disease with neuropathological investigation of the pathogenesis of associated dementia. Neuropathology 2008;28:532-40.
109. Loeb J, Feldt-rasmussen U, Madsen CV, Vogel A. Cognitive impairments and subjective cognitive complaints in Fabry disease: a nationwide study and review of the literature. JIMD Rep 2018;41:73-80.
110. Sigmundsdottir L, Tchan MC, Knopman AA, Menzies GC, Batchelor J, Sillence DO. Cognitive and psychological functioning in Fabry disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2014;29:642-50.
111. Körver S, Geurtsen GJ, Hollak CEM, et al. Cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms in Fabry disease: a follow-up study. J Inherit Metab Dis 2020;43:1070-81.
112. Anderson JF, Saling MM, Srikanth VK, Thrift AG, Donnan GA. Individuals with first-ever clinical presentation of a lacunar infarction syndrome: Is there an increased likelihood of developing mild cognitive impairment in the first 12 months after stroke? J Neuropsychol 2008;2:373-85.
113. Lelieveld IM, Böttcher A, Hennermann JB, Beck M, Fellgiebel A. Eight-year follow-up of neuropsychiatric symptoms and brain structural changes in Fabry disease. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137603.
114. Löhle M, Hughes D, Milligan A, et al. Clinical prodromes of neurodegeneration in Anderson-Fabry disease. Neurology 2015;84:1454-64.
115. Loret G, Miatton M, Vingerhoets G, Poppe B, Hemelsoet D. A long-term neuropsychological evaluation in Fabry disease. Acta Neurol Belg 2021;121:191-7.
116. Schermuly I, Müller MJ, Müller KM, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and brain structural alterations in Fabry disease. Eur J Neurol 2011;18:347-53.
117. Wadley VG, Mcclure LA, Warnock DG, et al. Cognitive function in adults aging with Fabry disease: a case - control feasibility study using telephone-based assessments. JIMD Rep 2015;18:41-50.
118. Cociasu I, Sorbera C, Tuttolomondo A, Morgante F. Anderson-Fabry disease: a rare cause of levodopa-responsive early-onset Parkinsonism. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021;8:S32-4.
119. Kahn P. Anderson-Fabry disease: a histopathological study of three cases with observations on the mechanism of production of pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973;36:1053-62.
120. Zedde M, Pascarella R, Cavallieri F, et al. Anderson-Fabry disease: a new piece of the lysosomal puzzle in Parkinson disease? Biomedicines 2022;10:3132.
121. Schiffmann R, Rapkiewicz A, Abu-Asab M, et al. Pathological findings in a patient with Fabry disease who died after 2.5 years of enzyme replacement. Virchows Arch 2006;448:337-43.
122. Ortiz A, Abiose A, Bichet DG, et al. Time to treatment benefit for adult patients with Fabry disease receiving agalsidase β: data from the Fabry Registry. J Med Genet 2016;53:495-502.
123. Sheng S, Wu L, Nalleballe K, et al. Fabry’s disease and stroke: Effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in stroke prevention, a review with meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2019;65:83-6.
124. Fellgiebel A, Gartenschläger M, Wildberger K, Scheurich A, Desnick RJ, Sims K. Enzyme replacement therapy stabilized white matter lesion progression in Fabry disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;38:448-56.
125. Rost NS, Cloonan L, Kanakis AS, et al. Determinants of white matter hyperintensity burden in patients with Fabry disease. Neurology 2016;86:1880-6.
126. Lenders M, Karabul N, Duning T, et al. Thromboembolic events in Fabry disease and the impact of factor V Leiden. Neurology 2015;84:1009-16.
127. Ferrari G, Reisin R, Kisinovsky I, et al. Major cardiovascular adverse events in Fabry disease patients receiving agalsidase alfa. Medicina 2021;81:173-9.
128. Eng CM, Germain DP, Banikazemi M, et al. Fabry disease: guidelines for the evaluation and management of multi-organ system involvement. Genet Med 2006;8:539-48.
129. Fazekas F, Enzinger C, Schmidt R, et al. sifap1 Investigators. MRI in acute cerebral ischemia of the young: the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients (sifap1) Study. Neurology 2013;81:1914-21.
Cite This Article
Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS
OAE Style
Moreno-Martínez D, León-Cejas L, Reisin R. Cerebrovascular disorders and Fabry disease. Rare Dis Orphan Drugs J 2024;3:9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.51
AMA Style
Moreno-Martínez D, León-Cejas L, Reisin R. Cerebrovascular disorders and Fabry disease. Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal. 2024; 3(2): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.51
Chicago/Turabian Style
Moreno-Martínez, David, Luciana León-Cejas, Ricardo Reisin. 2024. "Cerebrovascular disorders and Fabry disease" Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal. 3, no.2: 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.51
ACS Style
Moreno-Martínez, D.; León-Cejas L.; Reisin R. Cerebrovascular disorders and Fabry disease. Rare. Dis. Orphan. Drugs. J. 2024, 3, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.51
About This Article
Special Issue
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data
0
Cite This Article 0 clicks
Like This Article 2
likes
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.